It’s Time India’s Parliament Had A Calendar

by Derek O'Brien

The dates for the forthcoming Budget session of Parliament have been announced. Once again, at very short notice. We did some research and here is what we found. Historically, the Indian Parliament provided ample time for preparation. The first two Lok Sabhas (1952–1962) averaged a commendable 47 days between the time the notice was given, and the start of the session. Over the years, however, this gap has narrowed significantly. Under the current government, the average has plummeted to 17 days notice for summoning sessions—one of the lowest in the  history of independent India. This time around, the Parliamentary bulletin announcing the starting date (31 January) of the Budget Session, was announced on 17 January. Abysmal. 15 days notice!   

India’s Parliament has seen this troubling trend in the last two decades. The lack of proper planning hurts the functioning of a Parliamentary democracy. The diminishing lead time between the issuance of summons and the commencement of sessions is only one of the many ills that is ‘turning Parliament into a deep, dark chamber’. If schools and colleges can set up their calendars way in advance, why can’t Parliament? There are multiple advantages of preparing and then announcing a calendar for Parliament with sufficient lead time. Proper lead time will ensure higher quality of outputs from Members of Parliament (MPs). 

The Constitutional Gap

Unlike many other democracies, India does not have a fixed parliamentary calendar. Conventionally, Parliament meets for three sessions a year:

i. Budget Session (usually February-May),

ii. Monsoon Session (usually July-August), and

iii. Winter Session (usually November-December).

The only constitutional requirement is that there should not be more than six months between two sessions. The gap has enabled successive governments to carve out timing for sessions to suit themselves. This selfish tactic undermines the robustness of Parliament and raises serious questions. 

Can a Parliament that meets sporadically, with just two weeks notice, be an effective amplifier to voice concerns of citizens? Can a Parliament that gives MPs insufficient time to prepare, be a shining example of representative governance? Members of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha are elected not just to legislate, but also to hold the government accountable, scrutinise its actions, and debate matters of national importance. These responsibilities will be fulfilled far better with a structured and predictable Parliamentary calendar.  

Efforts to address this issue go back many decades. In 1955, the General Purposes Committee of the Lok Sabha explored the idea of a fixed Parliamentary calendar. Then again in 2002, the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution, emphasised the need for a minimum number of sittings. Unfortunately, these proposals have still not been implemented.  

In 2019, your columnist introduced a Private Member’s Bill in Parliament to establish a fixed calendar for Parliamentary sessions and mandate a minimum of 100 sitting days annually. This aimed to enhance the functioning of Parliament by ensuring governments do not evade accountability by delaying sessions or cutting them short. A fixed schedule would allow Members of Parliament to plan their legislative and constituency responsibilities effectively, ensuring adequate time for debating and scrutinising bills, policies, and issues of public importance. By guaranteeing at least 100 sitting days, the bill sought to strengthen the democratic process, improve legislative efficiency, and uphold transparency and accountability in governance.

During the Constituent Assembly Debates, members like K.T. Shah argued that the flexibility of not having a fixed calendar should not lead to misuse, emphasising that Parliament must meet often to ensure proper oversight of the executive.India prides itself on being the world’s largest democracy. Yet, the strength of a democracy is measured not by its size but by the effectiveness of its institutions. Parliament is the cornerstone of this system, and its proper functioning is essential for ensuring that the voices of citizens are heard and their concerns addressed. A fixed Parliamentary calendar is not just a procedural reform, it will be a big step toward restoring some measure of the dignity and purpose of this institution.  

In countries like the UK and the US, Parliament and Congress have fixed session schedules. For instance, the UK House of Commons follows an annual calendar approved months in advance, ensuring MPs can prepare and balance their legislative and constituency duties.

This issue transcends political affiliations. It is about safeguarding the democratic framework and ensuring that Parliament fulfills its constitutional mandate. Seventy five years after adopting the Constitution, is as good a time as any, to give the world’s largest Parliamentary democracy a calendar with a well-planned schedule, and at least 100 days of Parliament being in session. 

Let’s get this done.

[This article was also published in NDTV| Monday, January 20, 2025]

2024, the election year, the conflict year

by Derek O'Brien

This is the first time that Mexico could get a woman president. Joe Biden is seeking a second term in the United States. The Democratic People’s Party in Taiwan has just won a historic third consecutive term. The fourth most populous country in the world, Indonesia, will elect a new President soon. Sheikh Hasina has won a fifth term in Bangladesh.

In 2024, national elections are scheduled in over 60 countries. Two billion voters will cast their votes. That’s a quarter of the world’s population.

This is a “super election year”. Election booths will be buzzing in the United States, the United Kingdom, India and Indonesia. Psephologists and political enthusiasts will gleefully witness the dynamics of power, democracy, and unpredictability as elections play out on a global scale. Those suffering from politicophobia (a morbid fear of politics and voting) would prefer to fast forward to 2025.

One dominant theme emerges from elections being held across the globe this year — societal divisions have been laid bare. From the deeply polarising issue of abortion rights to the contentious debate over corporatisation in agriculture, the fault lines are stark. Many of these elections, including India’s, are not just about choosing leaders; they are about deciding the direction of societies ruptured by conflicting ideologies.

United Kingdom: Bookmakers’ odds are often dependable barometers to predict results in sport and politics. Even though elections in the UK are expected to be held in the latter half of 2024, British bookmakers have virtually already called the result. According to Ladbrokes, one of England’s oldest betting companies, the Labour Party, led by Keir Starmer, are clear favourites to win, with odds of 1/10. To give you some sense of what 1/10 odds mean, let me share a similar example from cricket.

If India is playing Afghanistan in a T20 match, India will probably start at the odds of 1/10 — favourites to win. In other words, if you invest £1,000 on the Labour Party winning, you only stand to gain £100. So, as far as the bookmakers are concerned, it’s pretty much a done deal for the Labour Party. In contrast, the Conservative Party led by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, has odds of 6/1. What this means is that a £1,000 bet on the Conservative Party will earn a huge £6,000 if the Conservatives win. The populist right-wing party Reform UK (earlier Brexit party), led by Richard Tice, are a distant third with odds of 50/1. It must be pointed out that there are multiple examples where favourites bite the dust.

United States: Trump versus Biden rematch. The economy, cost of living, LGBTQ rights, the war in Ukraine, and conflict in Gaza are some of the hot-button issues which are dominating political debate on American television. From campaign rallies to made-for-television debates, one flashpoint is certainly abortion rights.

The seismic 2021 overturning of Roe v. Wade and the Alabama Supreme Court’s controversial decision equating frozen embryos with children have intensified the cultural chasm between conservative and liberal states. Abortion has surged to the forefront of political discourse, with one in eight voters deeming it critical. Research indicates a doubling since 2020 in patients travelling for abortions, with medical abortions now exceeding half of all procedures.

These have had a profound impact on reproductive rights, stirring voter mobilisation and accentuating enduring ideological divisions. As both the controversial Donald Trump and the octogenarian President Biden line up on the starting blocks for second terms, abortion rights might determine who crosses the finishing line first.

South Africa: In a historic shift post-apartheid, South Africa’s upcoming general election on May 29 could see the African National Congress (ANC) receiving less than 50 per cent of the vote for the first time since 1994. I am no psephologist, but this could lead to a multi-party government, marking a significant moment for South Africans and the region.

India: The last five years have seen the country set many dubious records. Household savings have been at a 50-year low. Three out of four Indians cannot afford a healthy balanced diet. Four out of 10 graduates under the age of 25 are unemployed. Women earn just 60 per cent as compared to their male counterparts. And the Press Freedom Index ranks India 161 among 180 countries. These are the issues which the ruling dispensation will obfuscate. These are the issues which opposition parties across the country will need to amplify. These are the issues which television channels turned cheerleaders will ignore over the next six weeks.

Instead, the Union government will attempt to create a narrative around two laws — the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and the Women’s Reservation Bill. You don’t have to be a Parliament junkie to know that the timing is suspect. Consider these: While the average time taken to frame rules for a law is nine months, the rules for CAA were notified after 51 months (over four years). The Union government had asked for nine extensions. Then there was the Women’s Reservation Bill, passed in Parliament, but which can only be implemented after the Census and delimitation is carried out. 2034?

As the world’s largest democracy goes to elections in the summer of 2024, women’s political representation will only be limited to the glossy sheets of a slickly printed manifesto.

[This article was also published in The Indian Express | Friday, March 15, 2024]

An A to Z List For 2023

by Derek O'Brien

A random A to Z List for 2023. You too can draw up your personal A to Z List for the year that just slipped by.

A: Artificial Intelligence. ChatGPT has still not become this columnist’s personal AI assistant. Have you used DALL.E yet to create artwork from just a descriptive sentence? Deep fakes are a nightmare. For better or for worse, AI is here to stay.

B: Barbie. The only English film this columnist watched this year. Loved it. Innocuous at first glance but the underlying theme of women empowerment endures.

C: Chandrayaan-3. Our scientists at ISRO. Our world champions.

D: Demographic dividend. India surpassed China to become the most populous country in the world. Our demographic dividend is expected to peak around 2041. The next eight years are crucial.

E: Election Commission. The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Bill, 2023 passed in the recently concluded winter session of parliament effectively gives the Union government unilateral power to appoint the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners. Neutrality?

F: Fascism. Noun. A way of organising a society in which a government ruled by a dictator controls the lives of the people and in which people are not allowed to disagree with the government.

G: G20 summit. A rotational presidency of G20 packaged as a gargantuan achievement.

H: Hangzhou Asian Games. Record 107 medals for India, 28 gold, 38 silver, 41 bronze.

I: Inflation. Compared to 2014, the price of rice has gone up by 56 per cent, wheat by 59 per cent, milk by 61 per cent, tomatoes by 115 per cent, and toor dal by 120 per cent. The price of an LPG cylinder crossed ₹ 1,000.

J: Jumla…

K: King Khan. What a year! Pathaan. Jawaan. Dunki. Someone’s come a long way from his appearance in the TV serial Fauji in 1988.

L: LGBTQ. Even though the Supreme Court declined to legalise same-sex marriage, thousands took part in South Asia’s oldest pride walk. Where else, but Kolkata! ❤️ you all.

M: Manipur. 180 days. 175 dead. Over 70,000 displaced. HE will still not visit.

N: Naatu Naatu. Unpopular opinion. Not the greatest song to come out of India. However, thrilled it was awarded the best original song at the 95th Academy Awards. The first Indian song to achieve this.

O: Odisha train accident. 296 people died in the crash, the deadliest in over two decades. A CAG report revealed that over 50 per cent of the compulsory track safety inspections were not done. Railway safety has to mean more than megalomaniacal selfie points at stations.

P: Parliament. 2001 attack: the Home Minister LK Advani and Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee gave a statement in the house within three working days. A full discussion happened on the floor of parliament over two days. 2023: 146 MPs suspended for demanding a discussion and statement from the Home Minister. Radio silence from the government on the floor of parliament.

Q: Quiz. There used to be the Bournvita Quiz Contest, Quiz Time and more. Nowadays, you very often see the word ‘quiz’ in the headlines. Guess why? Move over Siddhartha Basu, Amitabh Bachchan and another quizmaster. ED and CBI ‘quiz’ political opponents of this government every day.

R: Rocky aur Rani ki Prem Kahani. Fun film. Accuse this columnist of parliamentary bias, but the standout performance was that of Jaya Bachchan in the role of Dhanalaxmi Randhawa.

S: Sexual harassment against wrestlers. Champions in tears. Returning their medals. Quitting the sport. Heartbreak. (Someone has come up with the spunky idea that there should be one candidate put up to fight the good fight against the sitting Prime Minister in the Varanasi Lok Sabha seat. Sakshi Malik)

T: Turkey earthquake. Lethal. 7.8 magnitude earthquake resulted in 50,000 lives lost. In a show of global solidarity, citizens from 94 countries joined in the relief and rescue efforts.

U: Uttarakhand tunnel collapse. 41 workers trapped for 17 days before they were rescued with the help of 12 rat-hole miners. Real life heroes: Feroz Qureshi, Munna Quereshi, Rashid, Irshad, Naseem, Monu, Naseer, Ankur, Jatin, Saurabh, Waqeel Hasan, and Devender. (Ironic, since rat-hole mining has been banned in India since 2014).

V: Vacancies. There are 6,000 seats vacant in central universities for SC/ST/OBC students. 5,000 posts of judges vacant in district and subordinate courts. Over 82,000 vacancies in paramilitary forces. 1.5 lakh posts vacant in railways.

W: World Cup. India broke a billion hearts. Shami sprinted to the fastest 50 wickets in World Cup Cricket.

X: No, Elon.

Y: Youth. One in four youth in India is unemployed. 45 per cent of young graduates under the age of 25 do not have jobs.

Z: Zionism. Go google the term.

[This article was also published in NDTV | Tuesday, December 30, 2023]